Othello Report Essay Essays

Othello Report Essay Essays Othello Report Essay Paper Othello Report Essay Paper In here, Othello talks about wanting to be remembered with fairness as one who loved too much, how he was tricked into extreme jealousy and as one who did not realize the worth of what he had. He expresses his desire to be recorded as the man who killed a Turk who insulted the state of Venice, and kills himself, dying on Desdemonas bed. Cassio was shocked as he had known Othello as the brave one. Lodovico then ended the tragic incident by asking Cassio to deal with the defeated Iago, asking Gratiano to guard the house leaving him with Othellos fortune. Iago pretty well convinced Othello that his wife was unfaithful. With this lie believed, he became extremely jealous and strangled Desdemona to death, realizing only too late that she is completely innocent after all. As he delivers his last speech, he reflects upon the period of his life and his service as the Venetian army. He describes his transformation from a proud soldier to a murderer. He demanded for the truth to be represented cleanly and asserts that it was his own foolishness and jealousy that caused Desdemonas death, and not the actions of Iago. From line 334 onwards was the romantic use of Othellos language. It was a speech that reestablishes his honorable nature and his greatness. Othello started talking to Lodovico. I have done the state some service this line implies that Othello reminded them who he was back in the past, how he made the state proud of him and his reputation. He commanded Lodovico to record his story faithfully. I pray you in your letters the word pray could mean that he is begging Lodovico to do what Othello says. Then you must speak Of one that loved not wisely, but too well; Of one, not easily jealous, but being wrought Perplexed in the extreme With these lines, Othello reviews the plays dramatic arc. Its brings back how Othello used to be in the beginning of the play, before the whole incident occurred. At the beginning of the play, he is a hero, proud, and dignified. His downfall was due to someone which he could not really control Iago. Like base Indian, threw the pearl away This was referring to Othello himself as he was a black just like an Indian. Base Indian could be the American Indian who did not value precious stones. Othello referred himself to an Indian because he did not recognize Desdemonas true value. Othello then breaks down into tears, something which he is not used to. Albeit unused to the melting mood He allows himself to express sadness at his own fate. Drop tears as fast as the Arabian trees This indicated that Othello is having a real heartfelt break down, as he emphasizes that tears were coming down faster than normal, despite that he probably never broke down and cried before. Othello told Lodovico to record his tears, tells him how he once came upon a Turk beating a Venetian and violently killed him. There is a bit of contradictory here. In the beginning of the play, Othello was far more than black but now he has turned Turk and become a true racial outsider. In line 351, the circumcised dog these words sounds ultimately wrong to describe Othello. He could mean himself being betrayed, being a fool, being too gullible, being dumb all these words being put together. He then killed himself: And smote him, thus. It was the same way as the Turk being killed, as mentioned above. In this passage, there were also some words of racism such as Indian, Arabian and turbaned Turk. All these words were being referred to Othello himself when he made his speech. His final words summarized his position at the end of the play, regaining his composure. He started from a noble figure and dies as a murderer. His last speech emphasizes the tragedy of his downfall and perfectly encapsulates the themes of the play. Gratiano indicates that Othellos speech was something unexpected, something which he would never expect to hear coming out from Othellos mouth: All thats spoke is marred. This was probably because Gratiano never expects Othello to be in that state where he gives everything up. As he is dying, he says that he kissed Desdemona before he killed her with regret and sadness. This suggests that perhaps his love for her flickered briefly within his dark soul before he murdered her. He reminds himself that perhaps he was not wholly corrupt, but he dies knowing that his soul is lost. Lodovico speaks to Iago with harsh words. He called him a Spartan dog which meant savagery. More fell that anguish, hunger, or the sea He said that Iago was crueller than anguish, hunger and the sea. They are 3 totally different words that Lodovico that is used to compare Iagos cruelty. This emphasizes that Iago is inhuman, being crueller than anything else. The object poisons sight; Let it be hid. He referred to the sight of Othello slumped against Desdemona on bed as an object as they are already dead. The word poisons could also be referring to Iagos cruelty and unfaithfulness. He wants it not to be seen as not to let anyone be reminded of Iago. He also told Gratiano to grab hold of Othellos possession. As they succeed on you. He thinks Gratiano is the most capable one. Lastly, he told Cassio to decide what to do with Iago, which he referred to as the hellish villain, again emphasizing his cruelty. The next few lines of Lodovicos speech were sad words that ended this whole tragedy. He said he must return to Venice and with heavy heart relates this heavy act. He described both the heart and act heavy indicating the disaster Iago had caused. The speeches made at the last part of the play were all miserable. Othello made his last speech in that way because he wanted the audience to know who he really is before he dies. He speaks about his past service to the Venetian state and he describes himself not as a barbarous foreigner but as one who loved not wisely but too well, as one who was preyed upon and as one perplexed in the extreme. He has accepted what has happened and is willing to punish himself for it.

Existentialism throughout the works of Camus essays

Existentialism throughout the works of Camus essays Camus The Myth of Sisyphus provides the philosophical basis for his additional novel, The Stranger. The two main characters of the novels both support Camus beliefs of existentialism. According to this philosophy, existence is emphasized, while abstract ideas are disregarded. It suggests that the meaning of life cannot be defined by human reason and that an individual must live solely based on what is known and discard anything that is not entirely certain. Through their inevitable fate, disrespect, assertion of freedom and choice, and indifference towards society, the reader can come to see a philosophical parallel between this mythological figure and modern freeloader. The existentialist person must live solely based on what is known and discard anything that is not entirely certain. This is shown by both characters through their understanding of fate. Sisyphus is sentenced to ceaselessly rolling a rock to the top of a mountain only to watch the rocks decent. Instead of living unhappily and dissatisfied for eternity, Sisyphus accepts his challenge of fate. The only certainty of his life is his fate, therefore, he must live by this challenge without question. Similarly, Meursault is sentenced to death and forced to ponder societys evils. When seeking to the chaplain, Meursault says that he wants to live with the certainties of his life, even if his only certainty is the each that awaits him. Both Sisyphus and Meursault hold the same existentialist belief seen by the understanding of each characters fate. Both Sisyphus and Meursault show a lack of respect towards their society. This disrespectful behavior of Sisyphus and Meursault may be justified by their yearn for freedom and choice. Sisyphus is accused of a certain levity toward the gods. He steals their secrets, ignores their orders, and all together shows no honor or obedience. This same a...

Mistakes from Pearl Harbor Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Mistakes from Pearl Harbor - Essay Example t is the hope of this author that a better and more complete understanding of each can be appreciated by utilizing the lens of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor as a focal point to identify the failures of US strategy in preparing for and responding to such an attack. Though hindsight is always perfect, it is through an examination of past failures that the current student and/or researcher can hope to gain a level of inference into the means by which prior failures have occurred and why they have taken place in the precise means by which they have. Accordingly, the principles to be analyzed are as follows: objective, offensive, mass, economy of force, maneuver, unity of command, security, surprise, and simplicity. The objective of the raid on Pearl Harbor was clear and evident. Due to the fact that Pearl Harbor represented the highest concentration of American naval power in the Pacific region, an attack on such a target would yield a high level of reward for the enemy in that it could cripple the American ability to project force into the Pacific theater and held the potential of reducing the United States involvement in the Pacific to such a level that it would not be able to counter Imperial Japan’s actions and acquisitions. As the United States Army describes, â€Å"the ultimate military purpose of war is the destruction of the enemy’s ability to fight and/or will to fight†1. As such, the attack on Pearl Harbor was a clear and definitively targeted operation that was meant to destroy American capability. As a function of such an obvious threat and the concentration of American power that Pearl Harbor represented, it should have been perennially within the minds of the American military leadership that Pearl Harbor and other concentrations of American power within the Pacific region, as well as the rest of the world at that time, should be safeguarded beyond any level of steps that had previously been taken. As a function of the clear and